May 25, 2010
by Julie Saffrin
I had the privilege to meet Ellen Baker, author of “Keeping the House” at friend Jackie Anderson’s house. We gathered there for our book club’s May meeting. As Baker portrays in essays and correspondence on her Web site (www.ellenbakernovels.com), she has a sweet demeanor. She is an author who doesn’t touch the glory of her massive abilities and is all the more likeable because of it.
Our group of twelve had many questions for Baker about her American saga, sweeping in scope and generational relationships involved in World War I and II. We enjoyed hearing Baker’s thoughts on what most likely happened to the characters were she to write a sequel, which she does not plan to do.
But as a writer, I enjoyed hearing the back story of her journey to becoming a published author. I appreciated and benefited from her candor about her process. Here’s what I learned.
Getting the story right means hard work. When Baker worked at J. W. Beecroft Books & Coffee, a now-defunct coffee shop and bookstore in Superior, Wisc., she told herself she wanted to write a novel equal in composition to ones displayed on shelves. I think she accomplished her goal of deserving shelf space in an epic way. To do so, she worked at a historical museum, the Richard I. Bong World War II Heritage Center, to get the endless details right and interviewed many veterans. Readers get a true historical glimpse of war heroes and how difficult were those times. Her tale is an honest portrayal of the strains families put on sons who became soldiers and sons, because of the years they were born, who did not. Reading her story, rationing is understood. I got a kick out of young women drawing seams on the backs of their legs to depict seamed stockings.
Getting the story right takes a long time and means taking criticism and instruction and putting it into action. Baker first wrote about the Mickelsons, the characters in her book, back in 1996. But “it’s a long, long way from here to where we go,” as Beth Nielson Chapman sings. She started “Keeping the House” in 2003, and the Mickelsons became a part of the book. Baker’s road to publication involved plot adjustments and character changes and removing “darlings,” (an entire handwritten notebook of a part of the book didn’t make it into the final edition), to create an excellent novel. She added Dolly Magnuson, the twenty-something protagonist Baker plopped Dolly into a 1950 Lutheran church’s sewing group of middle-aged women. Dolly’s struggle for and against traditional housekeeping roles as well as her driving desire to receive value in life from her husband make the novel one in which many women can relate. Dolly’s world is a nice addition to this multi-hued gem of a novel.
Other changes came after Baker went to the Bear River Writers’ Conference on Walloon Lake, made famous by Ernest Hemingway. Attending the conference connected her to other writers who gave feedback on “Keeping the House.” She listened to their wise counsel and made their suggested changes, one of which included the addition of Mrs. Fryt (who is the judgmental standard bearer for what a woman should be and do when leading the Ladies Aid Society in 1950).
Baker finished “Keeping the House” in 2006. Only then did she solicit agents she thought fit her genre. Marly Rusoff became her agent and sold her book to Random House, which published “Keeping the House” in 2008.
Usually author accounts of post-contract details goes strangely quiet, but Baker openly shared her story of working with an editor and that was a big reason why I found Baker’s talk to our book club refreshing. She shared the work she did to make her book a great one. Baker did multiple rewrites even after the book sold. Her editor asked for a “little less trombone” to make the novel a perfect orchestration.
Getting the story right involves outlines. Baker outlines after, not before, she writes. She types her outlines and “cuts them in strips” and asks herself, “Could this scene go here instead?” Her reasoning for doing this is for her readers. “I need to keep the reader reading,” she said. So if moving plots and scenes to other chapters tightens and cranks the pace, then Baker moves them. She also works in layers each time she goes through her manuscript, concentrating on each layer separately, such as scene or dialogue, as she rewrites.
Getting the story right means being a committed writer. Baker generally writes for five hours each day. “I go to bed thinking about my work and I think my subconscious works while I sleep,” she said. She does her best work in the morning when she awakens. “I don’t allow myself to look at anything. I’ll just go straight to my computer and write what’s on my mind,” she said. She produces from three to eight pages daily.
Baker made me think about marriage and be grateful that some of its past hierarchies and roles have changed and there now is budge room in it. For younger readers, Baker realistically portrays not only how much dependence women put on men, but also she delves into the pressures men faced in choosing and being chosen to be the go-to guys, both in patriarchal relationships and as defenders of our country. The felt weight for both sexes crushes at times in this book.
Baker has just completed edits on her second novel, “The Work of a Woman,” another story that promises depth in relationships and plot. It is a story about women working in the shipyards on Lake Superior’s shores and their complex stories. The book releases in summer 2011. She rewrote the novel seven times to get it right. When her editor received the last rewrite, she told Baker the book moved from being “great” to being “phenomenal.”
I cannot wait to read it.







Recent Comments